Quantcast

short poll: JDK7 or 8?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
12 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

short poll: JDK7 or 8?

Christoph John
QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/


Hi list,

just a short question: QuickFIX/J 1.6.x is currently still compiled using JDK6. I want to increase
this to at least JDK7. I am a little uncertain as to whether it should be increased to JDK8 since
many customers seem to stick to JDK7 still (it is a mystery, but yes).

Any quick thoughts on this?
Thanks,
Chris.


--
Christoph John
Development & Support
Direct: +49 241 557080-28
Mailto:[hidden email]
       


http://www.macd.com <http://www.macd.com/>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MACD GmbH
Oppenhoffallee 103
D-52066 Aachen
Tel: +49 241 557080-0 | Fax: +49 241 557080-10
         Amtsgericht Aachen: HRB 8151
Ust.-Id: DE 813021663

Geschäftsführer: George Macdonald
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

take care of the environment - print only if necessary

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Quickfixj-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: short poll: JDK7 or 8?

vlad manuel
QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/



I would vote for JDK 8.
As for the guys still using JDK 7, this would be a good motivation to upgrade. They have to do it sometime anyway, as JDK7 will anyway be deprecated. And it already passed a lot of time since JDK 8 became available. 

Cheers,
Vlad
 
&&&


Le Lundi 17 octobre 2016 17h36, Christoph John <[hidden email]> a écrit :


QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/


Hi list,

just a short question: QuickFIX/J 1.6.x is currently still compiled using JDK6. I want to increase
this to at least JDK7. I am a little uncertain as to whether it should be increased to JDK8 since
many customers seem to stick to JDK7 still (it is a mystery, but yes).

Any quick thoughts on this?
Thanks,
Chris.


--
Christoph John
Development & Support
Direct: +49 241 557080-28
Mailto:[hidden email]
   


http://www.macd.com <http://www.macd.com/>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MACD GmbH
Oppenhoffallee 103
D-52066 Aachen
Tel: +49 241 557080-0 | Fax: +49 241 557080-10
    Amtsgericht Aachen: HRB 8151
Ust.-Id: DE 813021663

Geschäftsführer: George Macdonald
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

take care of the environment - print only if necessary

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Quickfixj-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Quickfixj-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: short poll: JDK7 or 8?

Colin DuPlantis
In reply to this post by Christoph John
QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/


JDK7, for now. We can't seem to get people to upgrade to 8 yet, either.


On 10/17/2016 07:36 AM, Christoph John wrote:

> QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
> QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/
>
>
> Hi list,
>
> just a short question: QuickFIX/J 1.6.x is currently still compiled using JDK6. I want to increase
> this to at least JDK7. I am a little uncertain as to whether it should be increased to JDK8 since
> many customers seem to stick to JDK7 still (it is a mystery, but yes).
>
> Any quick thoughts on this?
> Thanks,
> Chris.
>
>

--
Colin DuPlantis
Chief Architect, Marketcetera
Download, Run, Trade
888.868.4884 +1.541.306.6556
http://www.marketcetera.org


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Quickfixj-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: short poll: JDK7 or 8?

Daniil Sosonkin-2
In reply to this post by Christoph John
QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/


I'd vote for jdk8 since jdk7 is eol. Although I do agree, upgrading is
not a first priority for many places.

On 10/17/2016 10:36 AM, Christoph John wrote:

> QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
> QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/
>
>
> Hi list,
>
> just a short question: QuickFIX/J 1.6.x is currently still compiled using JDK6. I want to increase
> this to at least JDK7. I am a little uncertain as to whether it should be increased to JDK8 since
> many customers seem to stick to JDK7 still (it is a mystery, but yes).
>
> Any quick thoughts on this?
> Thanks,
> Chris.
>
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Quickfixj-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: short poll: JDK7 or 8?

vlad manuel
QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/



The problem with priorities is that they will never change if not pushed from one side.
This way, if people want the latest changes from QuickfixJ, budget will be found to upgrade to JDK8, and it will move up in the priority list.
 
&&&


Le Lundi 17 octobre 2016 18h31, Daniil Sosonkin <[hidden email]> a écrit :


QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/


I'd vote for jdk8 since jdk7 is eol. Although I do agree, upgrading is
not a first priority for many places.

On 10/17/2016 10:36 AM, Christoph John wrote:

> QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
> QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/
>
>
> Hi list,
>
> just a short question: QuickFIX/J 1.6.x is currently still compiled using JDK6. I want to increase
> this to at least JDK7. I am a little uncertain as to whether it should be increased to JDK8 since
> many customers seem to stick to JDK7 still (it is a mystery, but yes).
>
> Any quick thoughts on this?
> Thanks,
> Chris.
>
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Quickfixj-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Quickfixj-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: short poll: JDK7 or 8?

Christoph John
QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/



Hi,
forgot to mention: there is currently no plan or pull request to implement Java8 specific features. So it would probably be hard to justify the move. However, I understand your point.

On the other hand I don't know if QFJ will force people to upgrade, since it might be a lib that is used amongst many others.

Cheers,
Chris.

Am 17. Oktober 2016 18:19:40 MESZ, schrieb vlad manuel <[hidden email]>:
QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/


The problem with priorities is that they will never change if not pushed from one side.
This way, if people want the latest changes from QuickfixJ, budget will be found to upgrade to JDK8, and it will move up in the priority list.
 
&&&


Le Lundi 17 octobre 2016 18h31, Daniil Sosonkin <[hidden email]> a écrit :


QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/


I'd vote for jdk8 since jdk7 is eol. Although I do agree, upgrading is
not a first priority for many places.

On 10/17/2016 10:36 AM, Christoph John wrote:

> QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
> QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/
>
>
> Hi list,
>
> just a short question: QuickFIX/J 1.6.x is currently still compiled using JDK6. I want to increase
> this to at least JDK7. I am a little uncertain as to whether it should be increased to JDK8 since
> many customers seem to stick to JDK7 still (it is a mystery, but yes).
>
> Any quick thoughts on this?
> Thanks,
> Chris.
>
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Quickfixj-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users




Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot



Quickfixj-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Quickfixj-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: short poll: JDK7 or 8?

Robert Engels-2
QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/



If you are using any jdk 7 or jdk 8 specific features it should make no difference - only for distributed binary jars.

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Christoph John <[hidden email]> wrote:
QuickFIX/J Documentation: <a href="http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/ QuickFIX/J" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/



Hi,
forgot to mention: there is currently no plan or pull request to implement Java8 specific features. So it would probably be hard to justify the move. However, I understand your point.

On the other hand I don't know if QFJ will force people to upgrade, since it might be a lib that is used amongst many others.

Cheers,
Chris.

Am 17. Oktober 2016 18:19:40 MESZ, schrieb vlad manuel <[hidden email]>:
QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/


The problem with priorities is that they will never change if not pushed from one side.
This way, if people want the latest changes from QuickfixJ, budget will be found to upgrade to JDK8, and it will move up in the priority list.
 
&&&


Le Lundi 17 octobre 2016 18h31, Daniil Sosonkin <[hidden email]> a écrit :


QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/


I'd vote for jdk8 since jdk7 is eol. Although I do agree, upgrading is
not a first priority for many places.

On 10/17/2016 10:36 AM, Christoph John wrote:

> QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
> QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/
>
>
> Hi list,
>
> just a short question: QuickFIX/J 1.6.x is currently still compiled using JDK6. I want to increase
> this to at least JDK7. I am a little uncertain as to whether it should be increased to JDK8 since
> many customers seem to stick to JDK7 still (it is a mystery, but yes).
>
> Any quick thoughts on this?
> Thanks,
> Chris.
>
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Quickfixj-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users




Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot



Quickfixj-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Quickfixj-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users




--

Robert Engels

 

OptionsCity Software
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 2300
Chicago, IL 60606

O. +1 (312) 605-4500 | F. +1 (312) 635-1751 

 

Connect with OptionsCity at www.optionscity.com  | LinkedIn  |  Twitter  |  YouTube  |  Facebook

 

 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Quickfixj-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: short poll: JDK7 or 8?

thannon
In reply to this post by Christoph John
QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/


JDK 7 for QF/J 1.6.x
JDK 8 for QF/J 1.7.x

Regards,
Tommy

> On 17 Oct 2016, at 9:36 AM, Christoph John <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
> QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/
>
>
> Hi list,
>
> just a short question: QuickFIX/J 1.6.x is currently still compiled using JDK6. I want to increase
> this to at least JDK7. I am a little uncertain as to whether it should be increased to JDK8 since
> many customers seem to stick to JDK7 still (it is a mystery, but yes).
>
> Any quick thoughts on this?
> Thanks,
> Chris.
>
>
> --
> Christoph John
> Development & Support
> Direct: +49 241 557080-28
> Mailto:[hidden email]
>
>
>
> http://www.macd.com <http://www.macd.com/>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> MACD GmbH
> Oppenhoffallee 103
> D-52066 Aachen
> Tel: +49 241 557080-0 | Fax: +49 241 557080-10
> Amtsgericht Aachen: HRB 8151
> Ust.-Id: DE 813021663
>
> Geschäftsführer: George Macdonald
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> take care of the environment - print only if necessary
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfixj-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Quickfixj-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users
BT
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: short poll: JDK7 or 8?

BT
QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/



JDK 7 for QF/J 1.6.x
JDK 8 for QF/J 1.7.x

On 17 Oct 2016, at 18:10, [hidden email] wrote:

QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/


JDK 7 for QF/J 1.6.x
JDK 8 for QF/J 1.7.x

Regards,
Tommy

On 17 Oct 2016, at 9:36 AM, Christoph John <[hidden email]> wrote:

QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/


Hi list,

just a short question: QuickFIX/J 1.6.x is currently still compiled using JDK6. I want to increase
this to at least JDK7. I am a little uncertain as to whether it should be increased to JDK8 since
many customers seem to stick to JDK7 still (it is a mystery, but yes).

Any quick thoughts on this?
Thanks,
Chris.


--
Christoph John
Development & Support
Direct: +49 241 557080-28
Mailto:Christoph.John@...
   


http://www.macd.com <http://www.macd.com/>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MACD GmbH
Oppenhoffallee 103
D-52066 Aachen
Tel: +49 241 557080-0 | Fax: +49 241 557080-10
    Amtsgericht Aachen: HRB 8151
Ust.-Id: DE 813021663

Geschäftsführer: George Macdonald
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

take care of the environment - print only if necessary

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Quickfixj-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Quickfixj-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Quickfixj-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: short poll: JDK7 or 8?

kimptoc
QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/



Our limiting factor is the Java versions available for RHEL. 

Current upgrades mean that hopefully we will be running jdk8 in PROD early next year, so I would vote for 8. We rarely change quickfix though - very stable - many thanks :)


---
Sent from Boxer | http://getboxer.com

On 17 October 2016 at 19:37:32 BST, BT <[hidden email]> wrote:
QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/


JDK 7 for QF/J 1.6.x
JDK 8 for QF/J 1.7.x

On 17 Oct 2016, at 18:10, [hidden email] wrote:

QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/


JDK 7 for QF/J 1.6.x
JDK 8 for QF/J 1.7.x

Regards,
Tommy

On 17 Oct 2016, at 9:36 AM, Christoph John <[hidden email]> wrote:

QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/


Hi list,

just a short question: QuickFIX/J 1.6.x is currently still compiled using JDK6. I want to increase
this to at least JDK7. I am a little uncertain as to whether it should be increased to JDK8 since
many customers seem to stick to JDK7 still (it is a mystery, but yes).

Any quick thoughts on this?
Thanks,
Chris.


--
Christoph John
Development & Support
Direct: +49 241 557080-28
   


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MACD GmbH
Oppenhoffallee 103
D-52066 Aachen
Tel: +49 241 557080-0 | Fax: +49 241 557080-10
    Amtsgericht Aachen: HRB 8151
Ust.-Id: DE 813021663

Geschäftsführer: George Macdonald
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

take care of the environment - print only if necessary

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
_______________________________________________
Quickfixj-users mailing list


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Quickfixj-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________
Quickfixj-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Quickfixj-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: short poll: JDK7 or 8?

Christoph John
QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/


Hi Chris,

thankyou. I'll have to say that there were many useful contributions since the project has moved to
github. So thanks to the community on this one. :)

Cheers,
Chris.

On 17/10/16 20:59, Chris Kimpton wrote:

> QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
> QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/
>
>
>
>
> Our limiting factor is the Java versions available for RHEL.
>
> Current upgrades mean that hopefully we will be running jdk8 in PROD early next year, so I would
> vote for 8. We rarely change quickfix though - very stable - many thanks :)
>
>
> ---
> Sent from Boxer | http://getboxer.com <http://bxr.io/PBID1>
>
> On 17 October 2016 at 19:37:32 BST, BT <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
>> QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/
>>
>>
>>> JDK 7 for QF/J 1.6.x
>>> JDK 8 for QF/J 1.7.x
>>
>> On 17 Oct 2016, at 18:10, [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
>>> QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/
>>>
>>>
>>> JDK 7 for QF/J 1.6.x
>>> JDK 8 for QF/J 1.7.x
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Tommy
>>>
>>>> On 17 Oct 2016, at 9:36 AM, Christoph John <[hidden email]
>>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
>>>> QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi list,
>>>>
>>>> just a short question: QuickFIX/J 1.6.x is currently still compiled using JDK6. I want to increase
>>>> this to at least JDK7. I am a little uncertain as to whether it should be increased to JDK8 since
>>>> many customers seem to stick to JDK7 still (it is a mystery, but yes).
>>>>
>>>> Any quick thoughts on this?
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Chris.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Christoph John
>>>> Development & Support
>>>> Direct: +49 241 557080-28
>>>> Mailto:[hidden email]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://www.macd.com <http://www.macd.com/>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> MACD GmbH
>>>> Oppenhoffallee 103
>>>> D-52066 Aachen
>>>> Tel: +49 241 557080-0 | Fax: +49 241 557080-10
>>>> Amtsgericht Aachen: HRB 8151
>>>> Ust.-Id: DE 813021663
>>>>
>>>> Geschäftsführer: George Macdonald
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> take care of the environment - print only if necessary
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>>> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org <http://SlashDot.org>! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Quickfixj-users mailing list
>>>> [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org <http://SlashDot.org>! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Quickfixj-users mailing list
>>> [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org!
>> http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________
>> Quickfixj-users mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Quickfixj-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users

--
Christoph John
Development & Support
Direct: +49 241 557080-28
Mailto:[hidden email]
       


http://www.macd.com <http://www.macd.com/>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MACD GmbH
Oppenhoffallee 103
D-52066 Aachen
Tel: +49 241 557080-0 | Fax: +49 241 557080-10
         Amtsgericht Aachen: HRB 8151
Ust.-Id: DE 813021663

Geschäftsführer: George Macdonald
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

take care of the environment - print only if necessary

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Quickfixj-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: short poll: JDK7 or 8?

Christoph John
In reply to this post by BT
QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/


This was also my gut feeling. I think we will do it this way for now. So in the case someone wanted
to implement some JDK8-specific logic it could be done on the 1.7.x master branch.

Thanks to all for your input.
Cheers,
Chris.

On 17/10/16 20:36, BT wrote:

>> JDK 7 for QF/J 1.6.x
>> JDK 8 for QF/J 1.7.x
>
> On 17 Oct 2016, at 18:10, [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
>> QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/
>>
>>
>> JDK 7 for QF/J 1.6.x
>> JDK 8 for QF/J 1.7.x
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tommy
>>
>>> On 17 Oct 2016, at 9:36 AM, Christoph John <[hidden email]
>>> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>>
>>> QuickFIX/J Documentation: http://www.quickfixj.org/documentation/
>>> QuickFIX/J Support: http://www.quickfixj.org/support/
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi list,
>>>
>>> just a short question: QuickFIX/J 1.6.x is currently still compiled using JDK6. I want to increase
>>> this to at least JDK7. I am a little uncertain as to whether it should be increased to JDK8 since
>>> many customers seem to stick to JDK7 still (it is a mystery, but yes).
>>>
>>> Any quick thoughts on this?
>>> Thanks,
>>> Chris.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Christoph John
>>> Development & Support
>>> Direct: +49 241 557080-28
>>> Mailto:[hidden email]
>>>
>>>
>>>

--
Christoph John
Development & Support
Direct: +49 241 557080-28
Mailto:[hidden email]
       


http://www.macd.com <http://www.macd.com/>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MACD GmbH
Oppenhoffallee 103
D-52066 Aachen
Tel: +49 241 557080-0 | Fax: +49 241 557080-10
         Amtsgericht Aachen: HRB 8151
Ust.-Id: DE 813021663

Geschäftsführer: George Macdonald
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

take care of the environment - print only if necessary

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Quickfixj-users mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quickfixj-users
Loading...